If they make time and fulfill their roles--that's an average score. Add in structure, clear arguments, and rebuttals if necessary plus one. Plus two, if they preview, summarize, and add in more detail. Plus three, if you want to listen to them--they're captivating.
Pm must give:
rebut--def, harm, model/principle, and justification
argument 1 and w
rebut the rebuttals, countermodel, a1, and a2
give A3 and A4
rebut the rebuttals, countermodel, A1 and A2 rebuild--then rebut A3 and A4.
give new A3 and A4
rebut A3 and A4
issues--harm, model, arguments
rebut the issues in issues
sum it up
prioritize and sum up
Be holistic first in your presentation of the verdict--talk about issues like the harm, model, and arguments, but don't call them harm, model and argument--or for the test--say the harm was the oppression of women--the govt developed this idea through three main arguments--the opp countered with these rebuttals--there was substantiation and refutation from and we see that overall, I felt on this issue--give it to gov/opp
POI's are 15 seconds and can be given every 20 seconds
whips/replies can't give new matter/arguments
Pm must state entire model in that speech
LO must state entire counter model in that speech
definitions should be in PM and LO--Lo rebuts it here and this issue dies here, it's not brought up until the end to sum up in the replies
world school can run a negative case,,but all-asians cannot.
nothing is guaranteed--if there is no counter model presented but they imply status quo, then so be it.
there are no automatic losses--
nothing is automatic, but that does greatly hurt that sides case
keep these in mind and you should pass the adj test