This site is a resource for people to learn about debate. It will include World Schools style, All-Asians, National Foresenic League USA, and British Parliamentary style including adjudicating and debating plus coaching. FOR DEBATE COACHING please contact email@example.com
Debate Judging and Debating $14.99
for USD $14.99, Debate Judging and Debating Handbook will show you how to teach debate, debate, and judge it. It's all you need to know to become a better debater, judge, and teacher. By Mr. Gary, 2010 World Schools Adjudicator for Thailand at Scotland and 2017 Bali, a certified science teacher, he's been assisting the National Team for Thailand--2008-2011, 2013-present.
These three books are simple short introductions to different things. The book on nuclear weapons outline case strategies, contradictions in the gov and opp case, and how to win the debate--principally and practically.
When you're scoring the round, remember the demonstration debate will be composed of university and high school debaters. If they're separated as such, the university debaters will be better. If not, then, you score as follows-- the average is 75, pretend it's 74. Think of someone you know, the best high school debater at my school is probably two points above average--the real average so 77. The University debater will be similar. The highest score you give should be 78 or lower. Scoring lower is better than too high, because if you score too high, they will ding you.
If they make time and fulfill their roles--that's an average score. Add in structure, clear arguments, and rebuttals if necessary plus one. Plus two, if they preview, summarize, and add in more detail. Plus three, if you want to listen to them--they're captivating.
Pm must give:
rebut--def, harm, model/principle, and justification
argument 1 and w
rebut the rebuttals, countermodel, a1, and a2
give A3 and A4
rebut the rebuttals, countermodel, A1 and A2 rebuild--then rebut A3 and A4.
give new A3 and A4
rebut A3 and A4
issues--harm, model, arguments
rebut the issues in issues
sum it up
prioritize and sum up
Be holistic first in your presentation of the verdict--talk about issues like the harm, model, and arguments, but don't call them harm, model and argument--or for the test--say the harm was the oppression of women--the govt developed this idea through three main arguments--the opp countered with these rebuttals--there was substantiation and refutation from and we see that overall, I felt on this issue--give it to gov/opp
POI's are 15 seconds and can be given every 20 seconds
whips/replies can't give new matter/arguments
Pm must state entire model in that speech
LO must state entire counter model in that speech
definitions should be in PM and LO--Lo rebuts it here and this issue dies here, it's not brought up until the end to sum up in the replies
world school can run a negative case,,but all-asians cannot.
nothing is guaranteed--if there is no counter model presented but they imply status quo, then so be it.
there are no automatic losses--
nothing is automatic, but that does greatly hurt that sides case
keep these in mind and you should pass the adj test
Hawaii Tennis Pro presents
his tennis strategies in
Singles in an easy to understand
Ebook for only $29.99 plus 7% tax.
130 pages and counting. one year of free updates plus video links with simple explanations.
it will be sent via email to you and when we update it, we update your copy for one year.
Nearly every page has clear diagrams and pictures to help with your understanding. Difficult topics have a video link for added understanding. Hawaii Tennis Pro Tennis for everyone. Covers mental toughness, match preparation, practice techniques to work on the shot and shot selections